Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 1 de ene. de 1996 · Abstract. All else being equal, not many people would prefer to destroy the world. Even faceless corporations, meddling governments, reckless scientists, and other agents of doom, require a world in which to achieve their goals of profit, order, tenure, or other villainies. If our extinction proceeds slowly enough to allow a moment of horrified ...

  2. www.cato-unbound.org › contributors › eliezer-yudkowskyEliezer Yudkowsky | Cato Unbound

    Eliezer Yudkowsky is a research fellow at the Singularity Institute, where he researches Friendly AI and recursive self-improvement. In 2001, he published Creating Friendly AI: The Analysis and Design of Benevolent Goal Architectures. He is the author of the papers “Cognitive Biases Potentially Affecting Judgment of Global Risks” and “AI ...

  3. 27 de mar. de 2013 · Existential risk is a concept that can focus long-term global efforts and sustainability concerns. • The biggest existential risks are anthropogenic and related to potential future technologies. • A moral case can be made that existential risk reduction is strictly more important than any other global public good. •

  4. Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks, in Bostrom, N. and Ćirković, M. (eds.), Global Catastrophic Risks (pp. 91–119). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  5. Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks. Forthcoming in Global Catastrophic Risks, eds. Nick Bostrom and Milan Cirkovic Draft of August 31, 2006. Eliezer Yudkowsky (yudkowsky@singinst.org) Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Palo Alto, CA.

  6. 19 de jun. de 2009 · For instance, “Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks”, by Eliezer Yudkowsky, a research fellow at the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, offers a clear overview of why people tend to underestimate their risks and what biases influence those perceptions.

  7. Here I demonstrate that there are more than hundred cognitive biases affecting judgment of global risks. The sheer number of them demonstrates that is very difficult to come to unequivocal conclusion about the types and probabilities of global risks,