Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 3 de mar. de 2021 · 12 Zurn, Axel Honneth gathers a lot of critical perspectives in his introduction to Honneth’s thinking. In my context, the following volume stands out: Brink and Owen, Recognition and Power . 13 “Something in the physical world – be it modes of conduct or institutional circumstances – must change if the addressee or addressees are to be convinced that they have been recognised in a new ...

  2. According to Honneth, there is a unity that underlies critical theory's multiple approaches: the way in which reason is both distorted and furthered in contemporary capitalist society. And while much is dead in the social and psychological doctrines of critical social theory, its central inquiries remain vitally relevant.

  3. 27 de sept. de 2017 · Corresponding Author. David T. Schafer [email protected] Philosophy and Humanistic Studies Department, Western Connecticut State University, Danbury, CT, USA

  4. Honneth suggests that there are obstacles to make each of these three dimensions work, and that, if one wants to defend Critical Theory’s idea of social pathology (as he does), then one needs to reconfigure each of them. As we will see, in his own work, he has particularly reconfigured the second and third dimension.

  5. Pathologies of Reason. : Axel Honneth. Columbia University Press, 2009 - Philosophy - 222 pages. Axel Honneth has been instrumental in advancing the work of the Frankfurt School of critical theorists, rebuilding their effort to combine radical social and political analysis with rigorous philosophical inquiry. These eleven essays published over ...

  6. Axel Honneth has been instrumental in advancing the work of the Frankfurt School of critical theorists, rebuilding their effort to combine radical social and political analysis with rigorous philosophical inquiry. These eleven essays published over the past five years reclaim the relevant themes of the Frankfurt School, which counted Theodor W ...

  7. Axel Honneth describes the social morality of dominated classes in terms of mere “sense of injustice” and contests that it involves abstract representations of a general moral order or of a perfect society. The reference to domination plays a cardinal role in his analysis.