Resultado de búsqueda
Saxe-Coburg 1681–1735. 1681–1699 Albert V, 2nd son of Ernest I “the Pious”. 1699–1729 Johann Ernest IV, also Duke of Saxe-Saalfeld, 7th and youngest son of Ernest I “the Pious”, Duke of Saxe-Gotha. 1729–1735 Christian Ernest II, also Duke of Saxe-Saalfeld, son of the previous Duke, jointly with his brother, Franz Josias.
When Christian Ernest married unequally in 1724, Francis Josias claimed the sole inheritance of the duchy. His father's will (1729), however, compelled him to rule jointly with his brother. In 1735, the support of the line of Saxe-Meiningen allowed him to effectively rule over Coburg on his own right, and Christian Ernest's death in 1745 made him the sole Duke.
Ernest I (German: Ernst Anton Karl Ludwig; 2 January 1784 – 29 January 1844) was the last sovereign duke of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld (as Ernest III) and, from 1826, the first sovereign duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (as Ernest I). He was the father of Albert, Prince Consort, who was the husband of Queen Victoria. Ernest fought against Napoleon Bonaparte, and through construction projects and the ...
Ernest I, Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (1784-1844), was the eldest son of Franz, Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld, whom he succeeded in 1806. He succeeded to the Duchy of Gotha in 1826, after his brother-in-law’s death, through his marriage to Louise Saxe-Gotha. They separated in 1824 and divorced in 1826. In 1832 he married Mary of Württemberg. He was Prince Albert’s father and Queen Victoria ...
Ernesto I di Sassonia-Coburgo-Gotha Metadata This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it.
Ernst I de Saxa-Coburg-Gotha, pictură de John Lucas, 1838. Ernest I, Duce de Saxa-Coburg și Gotha ( germană Ernst Anton Karl Ludwig Herzog von Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha) (n. 2 ianuarie 1784 - d. 29 ianuarie 1844) a fost duce de Saxa-Coburg-Saalfeld iar din anul 1826, primul suveran al ducatului de Saxa-Coburg și Gotha .
La posizione ufficiale presa dalla Wikimedia Foundation è che le riproduzioni fedeli di opere d'arte bidimensionali nel pubblico dominio siano da considerare anch'esse nel pubblico dominio, e che qualsiasi affermazione contraria rappresenta un attacco al concetto stesso di pubblico dominio ("faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain, and that ...
