Resultado de búsqueda
12 Angry Men is a 1957 American independent legal drama film directed by Sidney Lumet, adapted from a 1954 teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose. [8] [9] The film tells the story of a jury of 12 men as they deliberate the conviction or acquittal of a teenager charged with murder on the basis of reasonable doubt ; disagreement and conflict among them force the jurors to question their ...
26 de mar. de 2022 · The jury in a New York City murder trial is frustrated by a single member whose skeptical caution forces them to more carefully consider the evidence before ...
- 2 min
- 613.2K
- Amazon MGM Studios
12 hombres en pugna es una película dirigida por Sidney Lumet con Henry Fonda, Lee J. Cobb, Jack Warden, E.G. Marshall .... Año: 1957. Título original: 12 Angry Men. Sinopsis: Los doce miembros de un jurado deben juzgar a un adolescente acusado de haber matado a su padre. Todos menos uno están convencidos de la culpabilidad del acusado.
12 Angry Men (1957) This courtroom drama follows one man's attempt to have his fellow jurors reconsider evidence during a murder trial. The price before discount is the median price for the last 90 days. Rentals include 30 days to start watching this video and 48 hours to finish once started.
12 Angry Men, by Sidney Lumet, may be the most radical courtroom drama in cinema history. A behind-closed-doors look at the American legal system that is as riveting as it is spare, this iconic adaptation of Reginald Rose’s teleplay stars Henry Fonda as the dissenting member on a jury of white men ready to pass judgment on a Puerto Rican teenager charged with murdering his father.
12 Angry Men là bộ phim lấy cảm hứng từ một vụ án gây chấn động dư luận. Một thanh niên bị tình nghi giết cha ruột của mình. 12 người của hội thẩm đoàn bắt đầu phiên làm việc của mình và tất cả hội thẩm viên đều muốn kết thúc nhanh chóng vụ án vì các chứng cớ đã quá rõ ràng. Trừ một người duy ...
12 Angry Men: Directed by Sidney Lumet. With Martin Balsam, John Fiedler, Lee J. Cobb, E.G. Marshall. The jury in a New York City murder trial is frustrated by a single member whose skeptical caution forces them to more carefully consider the evidence before jumping to a hasty verdict.
