Resultado de búsqueda
This review shows how Pierre Gisel's comments on Ricoeur are redundant; how Graham Ward gets Ricoeur's understanding of evil clearly; but then it goes on to show how both Gisel and Ward do not understand/mention the influence of St. Paul and Jürgen Moltmann on Ricoeur.
23 de may. de 2022 · In terms of its main intention, Ricoeur’s “Evil, A Challenge to Philosophy and Theology” attempts to address the origin of evil and the reason why people do evil acts. But in particular, Ricoeur is concerned about how we received the challenge of evil, and as I will show later, how the theodicies in the past offered an unsatisfactory ...
To think of being inclines metaxological philosophy to ponder the goodness of being. In his chapter, Cyril O’Regan engages the various notes on evil throughout metaxological philosophy. His argument … Expand
27 de dic. de 2007 · Evil: A Challenge to Philosophy and Theology. By Paul Ricoeur. Brian Gregor, Boston College. Search for more papers by this author. Brian Gregor, Boston ...
27 de dic. de 2007 · Evil: A Challenge to Philosophy and Theology. By Paul Ricoeur. Brian Gregor. Boston College. Search for more papers by this author. Brian Gregor. Boston ...
all catalog, articles, website, & more in one search catalog books, media & more in the Stanford Libraries' collections articles+ journal articles & other e-resources
1 de ene. de 1993 · I’m used to reading Ricoeur and trudging through philosophical problems to arrive at a brilliant synthesis; that is not the case with this book. After presenting the various problems with neo-classical and modern views of evil and it’s origins, Ricoeur ultimately admits that philosophy and theology can only take us so far.
