Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 12 Angry Men, by Sidney Lumet, may be the most radical courtroom drama in cinema history. A behind-closed-doors look at the American legal system that is as riveting as it is spare, this iconic adaptation of Reginald Rose’s teleplay stars Henry Fonda as the dissenting member on a jury of white men ready to pass judgment on a Puerto Rican teenager charged with murdering his father.

  2. 12 Angry Men (1957) This courtroom drama follows one man's attempt to have his fellow jurors reconsider evidence during a murder trial. The price before discount is the median price for the last 90 days. Rentals include 30 days to start watching this video and 48 hours to finish once started.

  3. 12 Angry Men. In form, "12 Angry Men" is a courtroom drama. In purpose, it's a crash course in those passages of the Constitution that promise defendants a fair trial and the presumption of innocence. It has a kind of stark simplicity: Apart from a brief setup and a briefer epilogue, the entire film takes place within a small New York City jury ...

  4. 12 Angry Men was a delightfully and surprisingly insightful movie. As a member of the audience watching the film, it was exhilarating to see the protagonist make progress through his arguments and I found myself rooting for him, waiting to see what he would do next.

  5. Swiss Army Man Blade Runner 12 Angry Men. In Theaters At Home TV Shows. Following the closing arguments in a murder trial, the 12 members of the jury must deliberate, with a guilty verdict meaning ...

    • (61)
    • Drama
  6. Critics reviews. Following the closing arguments in a murder trial, twelve members of the jury must decide the fate of an inner-city teen. The deliberation process brings out the jurors’ prejudices and preconceptions about the trial, the accused, and each other.

  7. 12 Angry Men: Directed by Sidney Lumet. With Martin Balsam, John Fiedler, Lee J. Cobb, E.G. Marshall. The jury in a New York City murder trial is frustrated by a single member whose skeptical caution forces them to more carefully consider the evidence before jumping to a hasty verdict.

  1. Otras búsquedas realizadas