Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. A vicious fifteen-year-old droog is the central character of this 1963 classic. In Anthony Burgess's nightmare vision of the future, where the criminals take over after dark, the story is told by the central character, Alex, who talks in a brutal invented slang that brilliantly renders his and his friends' social pathology. A Clockwork Orange ...

  2. A Clockwork Orange Review. A Clockwork Orange is Anthony Burgess’ best-known novel. It follows Alex, a violent and seemingly irredeemable protagonist who is subjected to a brainwashing experiment at the hands of the State. No longer able to think violent thoughts, he serves as a lesson of the importance of free will. Pros.

  3. 21 de may. de 2019 · Dazzling and transgressive, A Clockwork Orange is a frightening fable about good and evil and the meaning of human freedom. This edition includes the controversial last chapter not published in the first edition, and Burgess’s introduction, “A Clockwork Orange Resucked.”. Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more.

  4. 19 de nov. de 2023 · An illustration of an open book. Books. An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video. An ... A Clockwork Orange 4k. Topics a. A Addeddate 2023-11-19 ...

  5. The book is also filled with Nadsat, a slang language Burgess created for the novel that uses words, as quoted in the book, as “chepooka,” meaning nonsense, “choodessny,” meaning wonderful, and “britva,” meaning razor. Key Facts about A Clockwork Orange. Title: A Clockwork Orange; When/where written: 1962, England; Published: 1962 ...

  6. 21 de may. de 2019 · "A Clockwork Orange… is a book that can still be read with steady pleasure, continuous amusement and—at times—incredulous admiration." Martin Amis "Looks like a nasty little shocker, but is really that rare thing in English letters: a philosophical novel." Time. After his youthful adventures of raping and pillaging, Alex finds himself in ...

  7. A Clockwork Orange has variously been described as ‘a nasty little shocker’ (Time), ‘an inventive primer in total violence, a savage satire on the distortions of the single and collective minds’ (New York Times), ‘a terrifying and marvellous book’ (Roald Dahl) and ‘a fine farrago of outrageousness’ (Kingsley Amis).