Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Of these four total funds, the Medallion Fund is easily the most successful. Since its inception, Medallion has earned over $100 billion in profits for its investors, representing around a 39% average net return. To put this in context, a dollar invested with the Medallion Fund thirty years ago would have beaten the returns of the S&P Index by ...

  2. 23,5 mil millones de dólares. Premio Oswald Veblen en 1976. James Harris Simons ( Newton, Massachusetts, 25 de abril de 1938- Nueva York, 10 de mayo de 2024), 2 conocido como Jim Simons, fue un matemático, académico, mercader financiero, agente de fondos, corredor de bolsa, inversor y filántropo estadounidense .

  3. Jim Simons founded Renaissance Technologies. It's one of the most successful quant funds in the world. A quant fund determines investments based on mathematical models and algorithmic strategies. Their most successful fund is "Medallion Fund". From 2001 to 2013, the lowest return was +21%. In 2008 when the SS&P 500 lost over 38%, Medallion Fund ...

  4. 16 de may. de 2024 · “Fundamentally, Jim had a really deep interest in science,” says David Spergel, president of the Simons Foundation, which reported more than $4 billion in assets in 2023. “He was just really curious.” Spergel adds that Simons was careful to ensure the Simons Foundation would continue to operate normally after his death.

  5. 16 de nov. de 2019 · Jim Simons reunió a finales de los años 70, en una zona rural al norte de Nueva York, ... La firma cuenta con otros tres hedge funds y, durante unos años, ...

  6. 10 de may. de 2024 · Jim Simons, the renowned quantitative hedge fund manager and mathematician, has died aged 86, according to a statement from his family foundation. Known as the “quant king”, Simons was a ...

  7. 19 de feb. de 2024 · Jim Simons funds are known for their high return rates. He didn’t have a negative year back from 1989 and returns were always higher than 30%. His best years were 2000, 2007, and 2008, with 128.1%, 136.6%, and 152.1% returns. In the 90s the returns fluctuated between 31.5% and 93.4%, and many thought that no one could beat that.