Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Richard Whately (1 de febrero de 1787 – 8 de octubre de 1863) fue un académico, retórico, lógico, filósofo, economista y teólogo inglés que también sirvió como arzobispo reformador de Dublín en la Iglesia de Irlanda.

    • Británica
  2. Erotetics. Richard Whately (1 February 1787 – 8 October 1863) was an English academic, rhetorician, logician, philosopher, economist, and theologian who also served as a reforming Church of Ireland Archbishop of Dublin.

    • 5Philosophy career
    • English
  3. 15 de abr. de 2024 · Richard Whately (born Feb. 1, 1787, London, Eng.—died Oct. 8, 1863, Dublin, Ire.) was an Anglican archbishop of Dublin, educator, logician, and social reformer. The son of a clergyman, Whately was educated at Oriel College, Oxford, and took holy orders .

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
  4. Richard Whately (1 de febrero de 1787 – 8 de octubre de 1863) fue un académico, retórico, lógico, filósofo, economista y teólogo inglés que también sirvió como arzobispo reformador de Dublín en la Iglesia de Irlanda.

  5. Richard Whately (February 1, 1787 – October 8, 1863) was an English logician, educator, social reformer, economist and theological writer, and Anglican archbishop of Dublin (1831–1863). Whately’s two standard texts, Elements of Rhetoric (1828) and Elements of Logic (1826), are considered largely responsible for the revival of the study of ...

  6. 17 de may. de 2018 · WHATELY, RICHARD. ( b. London, England, 1 February 1787; d. Dublin, Ireland, 1 October 1863), logic. Whately’s father, Joseph Whately, was a minister and a lecturer at Gresham College. Shortly before his death in 1797, he placed his son in a private school at Bristol. Whately then went to Oriel College, Oxford, where he studied ...

  7. Richard Whately and the Gospel of Transparency. of Transparency. By David Levy and Sandra J. Peart* Abstract. Whately is a difficult thinker, partly because he is compe- tent in so many disciplines. Joseph Schumpeter, who struggled with Whatley's "elusive" greatness, saw a systematic core in Whately: the force behind Nassau Senior's axiomatics.