Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 4 de ene. de 2002 · “The Federalist No. 8, [20 November 1787],” Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0160. [Original source: The Papers of Alexander Hamilton , vol. 4, January 1787 – May 1788 , ed. Harold C. Syrett.

  2. Federalist No. 8, titled "Consequences of Hostilities Between the States", is a political essay by Alexander Hamilton and the eighth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in the New-York Packet on November 20, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist Papers were published.

  3. 20 de dic. de 2021 · FEDERALIST No. 7. The Same Subject Continued (Concerning Dangers from Dissensions Between the States) FEDERALIST No. 8. The Consequences of Hostilities Between the States . FEDERALIST No. 9. The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection . FEDERALIST No. 10.

  4. Federalist Number (No.) 8 (1787) is an essay by British-American politician Alexander Hamilton arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution. The full title of the essay is "The Consequences of Hostilities Between the States."

  5. 5 de sept. de 2023 · History, Humanities & Social Sciences. Full Text of The Federalist Papers. The Federalist, commonly referred to as the Federalist Papers, is a series of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison between October 1787 and May 1788.

  6. Summary and Analysis Section I: General Introduction: Federalist No. 8 (Hamilton) Summary If accepted as an "established truth" that war between separate parts was probable if the Union were dismembered, such wars between the states would occasion much greater distress than in countries that maintained regular standing armies.

  7. 21 de abr. de 2023 · Federalist No. 8 is the first of the Federalist Papers to explain just how standing armies are “problematic and uncertain.” Two quick examples: “it is of the nature of war to increase the executive at the expense of the legislative authority” and “the military state becomes elevated above the civil.”