Resultado de búsqueda
29 de dic. de 2023 · Por Javier Betancourt. viernes, 29 de diciembre de 2023 · 12:24. CIUDAD DE MÉXICO (Proceso).-. En la Cineteca Nacional se exhibe una cinta desapercibida en su momento: Amos Gitai se aventuró a ...
- Javier Betancourt
8 de nov. de 2011 · Roses à crédit: Directed by Amos Gitai. With Léa Seydoux, Grégoire Leprince-Ringuet, Catherine Jacob, Pierre Arditi. A young couple marry in France in the 1940s and the film follows the arc of their marriage over the next decade.
- (157)
- Drama
- Amos Gitai
- 2011-11-08
Roses à crédit es una película dirigida por Amos Gitai con Léa Seydoux, Grégoire Leprince-Ringuet, Catherine Jacob, Pierre Arditi .... Año: 2010. Título original: Roses à crédit. Sinopsis: Una joven pareja se casa en Francia en los años 40 y la película sigue su historia a lo largo de la próxima década.
- Eric Gautier
- Amos Gitai
- Francia
- Drama | Histórico. Años 40
Título original: Roses à crédit. Año: 2010. País: Francia. Dirección: Amos Gitai. Intérpretes: Léa Seydoux, Grégoire Leprince-Ringuet, Catherine Jacob, Pierre Arditi, Maud Wyler, Valeria Bruni Tedeschi, Elsa Zylberstein, Ariane Ascaride, André Wilms, Arielle Dombasle. Argumento: Elsa Triolet (novela)
- (3)
- Léa Seydoux
- Amos Gitai
Roses à crédit (lit. ' Roses on credit ') is a 2010 French drama film co-written and directed by Amos Gitai and starring Léa Seydoux and Grégoire Leprince-Ringuet. It is based on the 1959 novel of the same name by Elsa Triolet. It received its premiere at the 2010 Toronto International Film Festival. Cast
ROSES À CRÉDIT. Directed by. Amos Gitaï. France, 2010. Drama. 113. Synopsis. A young couple marry in 1940s France and we follow the arc of their marriage over the next decade. As France recovers from the trauma of the war, she finds herself increasingly caught up in acquiring material possessions while he prefers a more traditional lifestyle.
Be prepared for something entirely different with Roses à crédit, a film shot entirely in France, where evidence of contemporary society appears to be virtually absent (although there is indubitably a message for the present embedded in its tale). Israel is never mentioned; ditto the Holocaust.
