Resultado de búsqueda
Mikhail Petrovich Pogodin (Russian: Михаи́л Петро́вич Пого́дин; 23 November [O.S. 11 November] 1800 – 20 December [O.S. 8 December] 1875) was a Russian historian and journalist who, jointly with Nikolay Ustryalov, dominated the national historiography between the death of Nikolay Karamzin in 1826 and the ...
Historians of nineteenth-century Russian intellectual life cannot delve far into their research without encountering Nikolai Barsukov’s monumental biography of Mikhail Pogodin. Stretching over twenty-two dense volumes, Barsukov’s work offers far more than its title promises — an account of the life and work of the Moscow historian.
29 de nov. de 1991 · Mikhail "Golden Boy" Pogodin (13-4-0) is a Pro MMA Fighter out of Angarsk, Russia and the #119th ranked Pro Mens Bantamweight in Russia. View complete Tapology profile, bio, rankings, photos, news and record.
Mikhail Petrovich Pogodin was a Russian historian and journalist who, jointly with Nikolay Ustryalov, dominated the national historiography between the death of Nikolay Karamzin in 1826 and the rise of Sergey Solovyov in the 1850s. He is best remembered as a staunch proponent of the Normanist theory of Russian statehood.
a nation united in obedience to the Russian emperor. Mikhail Pogodin wrote in 1832, “Occupying an expanse that no other monarchy on earth has ever occupied, neither the Macedonian, nor the Roman, Arabic, the Frankish or the Mongol, [Russia] is settled principally by tribes who speak one language, have,
In the period of the 1830s to the 1850s, Mikhail Pogodin was one of the creators and spokesmen of the doctrine of "official nationality. Detailed analysis of his views on the “Slavic question” reveals not only his thoughts of the Russian policy, but also reconstructs his understanding of “nationality” and the processes of nation ...
Year of Graduation: 2021. M.P. Pogodin’s play “Peter I” represents ideas, views and historiosophical concept of one of the most active and prominent figures in Russian literature of 19th century on Peter’s epoch and on the obscure and crucial episode in the history of this period, the matter of tsarevich Alexei Petrovich.
