Resultado de búsqueda
The Leibniz–Clarke correspondence was a scientific, theological and philosophical debate conducted in an exchange of letters between the German thinker Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and Samuel Clarke, an English supporter of Isaac Newton during the years 1715 and 1716.
5 de abr. de 2003 · Samuel Clarke (1675–1729) was the most influential British metaphysician and theologian in the generation between Locke and Berkeley, and only Shaftesbury rivals him in ethics. In all three areas he was very critical of Hobbes, Spinoza, and Toland.
The correspondence between Leibniz and Samuel Clarke—mediated by Leibniz’s erstwhile friend and disciple at the electoral court in Hanover, Caroline of Brandenburg-Ansbach, princess of Wales—is arguably the most famous and influential of philosophical correspondences.
5 de abr. de 2003 · Samuel Clarke (1675–1729) was the most important British philosopher in the generation between Locke and Berkeley, at least in terms of influence on his contemporaries, and was a leading figure in Newton's circle.
23 de nov. de 2020 · On the standard interpretation, Samuel Clarke and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz endorse fundamentally different theories of free will. Clarke is typically interpreted as a libertarian who holds that freedom requires indeterminism.
- Julia Jorati
- jjorati@umass.edu
- 2021
6 de feb. de 2019 · While Clarke blames Leibniz for turning God into a necessary agent, Leibniz accuses Clarke of having a wrong notion of God’s power and wisdom. The aim of this chapter is to show how theological, metaphysical and cosmological considerations shape Leibniz’ and Clarke’s respective theories of space.
29 de feb. de 2020 · Clarke employed the PSR in his influential argument for God and also in the related arguments against Spinoza’s metaphysics (Rowe 1998, Schliesser 2012, Yenter 2014). Clarke and Leibniz both accepted the principle of sufficient reason and applied it widely.
