Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 22 de ene. de 2016 · That the emperor Manuel I Komnenos (1143–80) was responsible for some building activity in the Great Palace of Constantinople is a fact well attested by published sources and not entirely unknown to modern scholarship. However, the armchair archaeology of this work remains confused and obscure, and can benefit from a fresh review of the evidence.

  2. Manuel I Komnenos "Đại đế" (hay Comnenus) ( tiếng Hy Lạp: Μανουήλ Α 'Κομνηνός, Manouēl I Komnenos; ngày 28 tháng 11 năm 1118 - 24 tháng 9 năm 1180) là một Hoàng đế Byzantine vào thế kỷ 12, người trị vì trong một bước ngoặt quan trọng trong lịch sử của Đế quốc Đông La Mã ...

  3. Manuel I Komnenos, Latinized Comnenus, also called Porphyrogennetos, was a Byzantine emperor of the 12th century who reigned over a crucial turning point i...

  4. This article explores the fate of the Stone of Unction — the marble slab upon which, according to tradition, the dead body of Christ had been anointed for burial — in twelfth-century Byzantium. Focusing upon the Stone's association with Manuel I Komnenos, the article examines the imperial handling of this Passion relic in relation to ...

  5. Manuel fue el hijo legítimo del sebastocrátor Juan Ducas. Él fue así un primo hermano del emperador Isaac II Ángelo y Alejo III Ángelo, y un hermano de Miguel I Comneno Ducas y Teodoro Comneno Ducas de Epiro. Probablemente después de 1225 o 1227 se le dio el título de déspota como a su hermano, Teodoro. Casi al mismo tiempo se casó ...

  6. Manuel's habit of using large chunks of the Byzantine economy to negotiate the release of Latin prisoners from Nur al-Din in order to win favour with the Crusader States was unpopular. Likewise, the institution of pronoia saw a decentralization of the Empire's administration, with taxes filling the pockets of the holders of a pronoia instead of going back into the Empire's central economy.

  7. I think it’s better to call Manuel’s approach to the Crusader States “appeasement” instead of “acceptance”. The reason for this is because Manuel recognised the threat a Crusade could pose to Byzantium and knew it was best to stay on good terms with the Latins. His actions in Antioch also reflect this.