Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. E-Book: Current debate over the motives, ideological justifications, and outcomes of the war with Iraq have been strident and polarizing. A Matter of Principle is the first volume gathering critical voices from around the world to offer an alternative perspective on the prevailing pro-war and anti-war positions.

  2. A Matter of Principle: Humanitarian Arguments for War in Iraq. A Matter of Principle. : Thomas Cushman. University of California Press, 2005 - Iraq War, 2003- - 372 pages. "The scholarship contained in this collection is superior: it includes the leading and most sophisticated advocates of liberal internationalism from the worlds of the academy ...

  3. 1 de ene. de 2005 · 36 ratings5 reviews. Current debate over the motives, ideological justifications, and outcomes of the war with Iraq have been strident and polarizing. A Matter of Principle is the first volume gathering critical voices from around the world to offer an alternative perspective on the prevailing pro-war and anti-war positions.

  4. A Matter of Principle: Humanitarian Arguments for War in Iraq Thomas ... (eds), A Matter of Principle: Humanitarian Arguments for War in Iraq (Oakland, CA, 2005; ...

  5. It believes that the national approach is a better guarantee of peace and stability than the transnational alternative, and cases like the Iraq war provide some evidence for this conclusion. According to the national view, the business of politics is to maintain law, order, peace, freedom, and security within the borders of a sovereign state.

  6. The US-led Coalition’s war against Saddam’s regime in Iraq can be considered a liberal, humanitarian, and entirely reasonable war that was intended to foster a process of democratization and to incorporate states in the Middle East increasingly into the Society of Peoples.

  7. These arguments were pressed into service once again against the war in Afghanistan in 2001 and yet again against the war in Iraq in 2003. Nevertheless, these arguments had few supporters in 1999. These supporters were primarily recruited from the extreme right and “sovereignists,” who refused to accept a violation of Serbian sovereignty, a traditional ally of France.