Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Political theory and postmodernism. Stephen K. White - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Discourse in a coma; A comment on a comma in the title of Jean-François Lyotard’s Discourse, Figure. Daniel Rubinstein - 2013 - Philosophy of Photography 4 (1):103-108. Sexual identity, identification and difference: A psychoanalytic ...

  2. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources.

  3. Other articles where Discourse/Figure is discussed: Jean-François Lyotard: …his first major philosophical work, Discourse/Figure (1971), Lyotard distinguished between the meaningfulness of linguistic signs and the meaningfulness of plastic arts such as painting and sculpture.

  4. 14 de dic. de 2021 · constitute a fabric of meaning. Accordingly, Discourse, Figure is rightly considered a post-structuralist text to the extent that Lyotard seeks therein to complicate such readings of \"structures\" as well-ordered languages by means of the Freudian notion of a primary process of desire working \"below\" or \"inside\" of them, constituting them, but

  5. Discourse, Figure was published in 1972 at about the same time as we were engaged in what became an * Jean-François Lyotard, Discourse, Figure, trans. A. Huddek and M. Lydon, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2011. 544 pp., £30.00 hb., 978 0 8166 4565 7.

  6. 11 de ago. de 2011 · A wide-ranging and highly unusual work, Discourse, Figure proceeds from an attentive consideration of the phenomenology of experience to an ambitious meditation on the psychoanalytic account of the subject of experience, structured by the confrontation between phenomenology and psychoanalysis as contending frames within which to think the materialism of consciousness.

    • Jean-Francois Lyotard
  7. 15 de ene. de 2014 · Discourse, Figure, then, comprises by and large a radical Freudian reading of compossible-incompossible spaces. What Lyotard calls the figural , the text’s privileged category, “arises as the co-existence of incommensurable or heterogeneous spaces, of the figurative in the textual or the textual in the figurative, for example.”