Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. El Señor y el Campesino en la formación del mundo moderno (en inglés, The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World) es un libro del sociólogo político norteamericano Barrington Moore publicado originalmente en 1966.

  2. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (1966) is a book by Barrington Moore Jr. The work studied the roots of democratic , fascist and communist regimes in different societies, looking especially at the ways in which industrialization and the pre-existing agrarian regimes ...

  3. Resumen. En este texto sobre la obra del sociólogo norteamericano Barrington Moore Jr. se analiza su programa de investigación, en especial el uso ejemplar que hizo del método comparativo para comprender fenómenos de larga duración.

  4. Barrington Moore Jr. (12 May 1913 – 16 October 2005) was an American political sociologist, and the son of forester Barrington Moore. He is well-known for his Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (1966), a comparative study of modernization in Britain, France, the United States, China, Japan, Russia, Germany, and India. [2]

  5. 1 de ago. de 2014 · It is not hard to find reasons why Barrington Moore's Social Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship has had such widespread influence. Its approach, that of comparative, historical sociology, seeks clues to the present in the past, and Moore demonstrates mastery of a wide range of historical materials.

  6. 5 de jun. de 2012 · Barrington Moore, Jr.'s Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy is therefore all the more unusual and interesting because it is not only a work solidly within the classical sociological tradition, but also the product of a Marxist scholarly perspective.

  7. I suspect that the reason is twofold: (1) Moore insists on connecting "reactionary capitalist" development to "fascist" outbursts that were probably world- historically specific occurrences; and (2) Moore assigns an unrealistically important political role to landed upper classes, and systematically underrates the degree to which bureaucratic ...