Resultado de búsqueda
Hace 4 días · This was something that Richard Rorty was keen to point out, especially in the later stages of his celebrated career. In Rorty’s view, pragmatists like himself were wise to adopt deflationism rather than the typical pragmatist theory of truth, according to which what is true is what would be agreed upon at the end of inquiry.
Hace 2 días · La concepción de la filosofía de Richard Rorty. Según Rorty, “el interés moral del filósofo ha de ser que se mantenga la conversación en Occidente, más que exigir un lugar, dentro de esa conversación, para los problemas tradicionales de la filosofía moderna” (La filosofía y el espejo de la naturaleza, 1979).
Hace 3 días · Arguably (at least Richard Rorty argued thus 1), while remaining focused on the emancipation of repressed and discriminated groups, “identity” was an integral part of the emancipation movement: you could not, the argument ran, be fully emancipated as an individual if you happened to be a member of a repressed or a discriminated group.
Hace 3 días · This point is validated by postmodernist Richard Rorty. He writes, “Both the Age of Faith and the Enlightenment seem beyond recovery.” Stephen Hicks, in his work on the subject, juxtaposes modernist tenants with those of postmodernism, saying “Instead of natural reality—anti-realism.
Hace 2 días · Algo absurdo o no si dicen lo que pueden decir o no. algo absurdo o no; si dicen lo que pueden decir o no. Respuesta: el esclarecimiento. Rpta: D FILOSOFÍA DEL SIGLO XX-II (HERMENEUTICA Y POSTMODERNISMO) 1. Los filósofos que se mantienen dentro de la corriente principal son los filósofos a quienes llamaré sistemáticos, y a los periféricos ...
Hace 2 días · The American philosopher Richard Rorty was known for provocative statements about truth, one of which is, “Take care of freedom, and truth will take care of itself.”1 His argument was that truth gets all the protection it needs from freedom alone. Rorty held controversial views, but this one is especially unpopular today.
The argument seems to go: 1) numbers are only defined by their relations to other numbers. 2) This is to say that they are defined by wholly by “extrinsic” properties and not by intrinsic properties. 3) but essences are intrinsic and not extrinsic. 4) therefore numbers do not have essences.
