Resultado de búsqueda
Richard Whately (1 de febrero de 1787 – 8 de octubre de 1863) fue un académico, retórico, lógico, filósofo, economista y teólogo inglés que también sirvió como arzobispo reformador de Dublín en la Iglesia de Irlanda.
Richard Whately (1 February 1787 – 8 October 1863) was an English academic, rhetorician, logician, philosopher, economist, and theologian who also served as a reforming Church of Ireland Archbishop of Dublin.
15 de abr. de 2024 · Oct. 8, 1863, Dublin, Ire. (aged 76) Richard Whately (born Feb. 1, 1787, London, Eng.—died Oct. 8, 1863, Dublin, Ire.) was an Anglican archbishop of Dublin, educator, logician, and social reformer. The son of a clergyman, Whately was educated at Oriel College, Oxford, and took holy orders.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Richard Whately fue un académico, retórico, lógico, filósofo, economista y teólogo inglés que también sirvió como arzobispo reformador de Dublín en la Iglesia de Irlanda. Fue un destacado líder de la iglesia amplia, un autor prolífico y combativo sobre una amplia gama de temas, un personaje extravagante y uno de los primeros ...
Richard Whately, 1787-1863. Oxford logician, theologian, economist and Archbishop of Dublin. Richard Whately was educated in Bristol and Oriel College, Oxford, Whately was a leader of the "Noetic" generation at Oriel. In 1811, Whately was engaged as a tutor to Nassau William Senior at Oxford, and forged a lifelong friendship and intellectual ...
Quick Reference. (1787–1863), professor of political economy at Oxford (1829–31), then archbishop of Dublin. He involved himself in educational reform and published works on philosophy and religion, supporting Broad Church views, but his reputation rested largely on his Logic (1826) and Rhetoric (1828).
10 de ago. de 2016 · Whatley’s conception of logic depended on two principles. The first was that logic was (or should be) a science, based on clear theoretical principles. The lack of theory explained logic’s lack of progress and left it open to criticism. The second was that logic was about language, not thought.
