Resultado de búsqueda
1 de jul. de 1991 · It is upon this four-part perspective that our pyramid is based. in recent years, the term corporate social performance (CSP) has emerged as an inclusive and global concept to embrace corporate social responsibility, responsiveness, and the entire spectrum of socially beneficial activities of busi- nesses.
- Archie B. Carroll
- 1991
1 de jul. de 1991 · “Carroll's CSR Pyramid” clearly outlines four types of social responsibility for companies: economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic. These four areas play a leading role in setting...
- Archie B Carroll
- Ethics Permeates The Pyramid
- Tensions and Trade-Offs
- The Pyramid Is An Integrated, Unified Whole
- The Pyramid Is A Sustainable Stakeholder Framework
- Global Applicability and Different Contexts
Though the ethical responsibility is depicted in the pyramid as a separate category of CSR, it should also be seen as a factor which cuts through and saturates the entire pyramid. Ethical considerations are present in each of the other responsibility categories as well. In the Economic Responsibility category, for example, the pyramid implicitly as...
As companies seek to adequately perform with respect to their economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic responsibilities, tensions and trade-offs inevitably arise. How companies decide to balance these various responsibilities goes a long way towards defining their CSR orientation and reputation. The economic responsibility to owners or shareholde...
The Pyramid of CSR is intended to be seen from a stakeholder perspective wherein the focus is on the whole not the different parts. The CSR pyramid holds that firms should engage in decisions, actions, policies and practices that simultaneously fulfill the four component parts. The pyramid should not be interpreted to mean that business is expected...
Each of the four components of responsibility addresses different stakeholders in terms of the varying priorities in which the stakeholders might be affected. Economic responsibilities most dramatically impact shareholders and employees because if the business is not financially viable both of these groups will be significantly affected. Legal resp...
When Carroll developed his original four-part construct of CSR (1979) and then his pyramidal depiction of CSR (1991), it was clearly done with American-type capitalistic societies in mind. At that time, CSR was most prevalent in these more free enterprise societies. Since that time, several writers have proposed that the pyramid needs to be reorder...
- Archie B. Carroll
- acarroll@uga.edu
- 2016
10 de oct. de 2023 · The four dimensions of Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility (CSR) are, in this order, economic responsibilities, legal responsibilities, ethical responsibilities, and finally philanthropic responsibilities.
The pyramid of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is used to refer the famous model of Carroll, A.B., one of the distinguishing scholars in the literature.
- Duygu Turker
- turkerduy@yahoo.com
12 de ago. de 2023 · The pyramid of CSR is a model that identifies four key responsibilities of businesses: Economic (being profitable) Legal (following laws) Ethical (doing what’s right) Philanthropic (giving back to society) The pyramid shape shows how each responsibility builds on the others.
The famous CSR pyramid, published by Archie B. Carroll, shows four layers of responsibility in a hierarchical arrangement: an economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibility.
