Resultado de búsqueda
1 de ene. de 2002 · Thus have I fully examined that argument, which is esteemed the bulwark of the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy; and I flatter myself, clearly refuted it. The main pillar being now broken down, the whole structure may easily be demolished.
The Farmer Refuted, published in February 1775, was Alexander Hamilton's second published work, a follow-up to his 1774 A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress. Summary. In The Farmer Refuted, Alexander Hamilton addresses directly the main person to whom he was writing in opposition with his first work, Samuel Seabury.
The Farmer Refuted, &c., [23 February] 1775. The American History Collection > The Papers of Alexander Hamilton Digital Edition > The Papers of Alexander Hamilton > Volume I: 1768–1778 > Documents > The Farmer Refuted, &c., [23 February] 1775. Documents in this publication are viewable by registered users only. Log in or register for a free ...
Title. The farmer refuted: or, A more impartial and comprehensive view of the dispute between Great-Britain and the colonies, intended as a further vindication of the Congress: in answer to a letter from A.W. Farmer, intitled A view of the controversy between Great-Britain and her colonies: including a mode of determining the present disputes ...
The Farmer Refuted, February 23, 1775; Alexander Hamilton; Edited by Carson Holloway, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Bradford P. Wilson, Princeton University, New Jersey; Book: The Political Writings of Alexander Hamilton; Online publication: 13 December 2017; Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108381277.004
At the age of twenty and in law school, Hamilton wrote The Farmer Refuted. During the American Revolution, he served as a high-ranking officer in the Continental Army, and after the war he became the nation’s first secretary of the treasury and one of President George Washington’s top advisors.
The Farmer Refuted: Or, A More Impartial and Comprehensive View of the Dispute Between Great-Britain and the Colonies,: Intended as a Further Vindication of the Congress: in Answer to a...
