Resultado de búsqueda
14 de oct. de 2010 · Like its source material, "Freakonomics" is ultimately less than the sum of its parts -- an assemblage of moderately interesting human interest stories that don't carry much weight on the big screen.
本書を原作とした映画（en:Freakonomics (film)）が製作され、日本では2011年に公開される 。アレックス・ギブニー、モーガン・スパーロックらが監督陣 。 2010年には全世界で400万部を超える 。続編である『 超ヤバい経済学 （英語版） 』が発売される 。
FREAKONOMICS is the highly anticipated film version of the phenomenally bestselling book about incentives-based thinking by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. The film examines human behavior with provocative and sometimes hilarious case studies, bringing together a dream team of filmmakers responsible for some of the most acclaimed and entertaining documentaries in recent years.
1 de febrero de 2013. 1 de 1 usuarios han encontrado esta crítica útil. Pretenciosa y algo extravagante, sí, pero al mismo tiempo imaginativa e interesante, Freakonomics es un documental diferente. Aspira a una tarea tan ambiciosa como la de destruir prejuicios y alentar el pensamiento crítico y racional, y quizás debido a tan amplio ...
FREAKONOMICS is the highly anticipated film version of the phenomenally bestselling book about incentives-based thinking by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. The film examines human behavior with provocative and sometimes hilarious case studies, bringing together a dream team of filmmakers responsible for some of the most acclaimed and entertaining documentaries in recent years.
FREAKONOMICS is the highly anticipated film version of the phenomenally bestselling book about incentives-based thinking by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. The film examines human behavior with provocative and sometimes hilarious case studies, bringing together a dream team of filmmakers responsible for some of the most acclaimed and entertaining documentaries in recent years.
Review by Will Sloan ★½ 1. Part of a wave of garbage pop theory from the late Bush/early Obama era (see also: Malcolm Gladwell) designed to harness ambient dissatisfaction with the world around us and redirect it back to supporting the status quo. “Oh, so you think good things are good and bad things are bad?
