Resultado de búsqueda
of to be a a reasonable compelling resolution of a sensitive govern-. mental interest involved issue, amendment claims.75. equal criticism protection is warranted because and of the Court's first. willingness to "weigh the wisdom" of abortion. legislation, which is a practice outside of its given 74See, e.g., Dunn v.
3 de ene. de 2011 · California, 431 U.S. 595 (1977); and Ward v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 767 (1977) . but nonetheless have guided the Court since. In addition, the Court’s willingness to allow some regulation of non-obscene but sexually explicit or “indecent” expression reduces the importance (outside the criminal area) of whether material is classified as obscene.
A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the United States.
In Alberts v. California and Roth v. United States, decided today, post, p. 354 U. S. 476, the Court held to be constitutional the following standard for judging obscenity -- whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to prurient interest.
As early as 1896 the United States Supreme Court knew their meaning. (Swearingen v. United States (1896), 161 U.S. 446, 451 [16 S. Ct. 562, 40 L. Ed. 765, 766]), and a large number of cases since then have been decided on the theory that their meaning was not obscure. (See annos., 76 A.L.R. 1099, and People v.
16 de oct. de 2015 · JOHNSON, J. Valerie Alberts and others (hereafter plaintiffs), formerly employed as members of the nursing staff at two acute care psychiatric hospitals owned and operated by Aurora Behavioral Health Care (Aurora), filed the instant wage and hour lawsuit alleging, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals, that ...
Filed 10/16/15 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE VALERIE ALBERTS et al., B248748 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC419340) v. AURORA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE et al., Defendants and Respondents.
