Resultado de búsqueda
Sandel locates modern liberalism in the tradition of Kant, and focuses on its most influential recent expression in the work of John Rawls. In the most important challenge yet to Rawls' theory of justice, Sandel traces the limits of liberalism to the conception of the person that underlies it, and argues for a deeper understanding of community ...
- Michael J. Sandel
- 1982
978-0521567411. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (1982; second edition 1998) is a book about liberalism by the philosopher Michael Sandel. The work helped start the liberalism-communitarianism debate that dominated Anglo-American political philosophy in the 1980s.
- Michael J. Sandel
- 1982
18 de mar. de 2021 · Liberalism and the limits of justice : Sandel, Michael J : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive. by. Sandel, Michael J. Publication date. 1998. Topics. Justice, Liberalism, Libéralisme, Gerechtigkeit, Liberalismus, Liberalisme, Rechtvaardigheid, Filosofische aspecten, Justice sociale, Libéralisme (philosophie) Publisher.
16 de ago. de 2016 · Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Citation: Sandel Michael J. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. ( 2nd Edition 1998) . Cambridge University Press. Download Citation. Abstract: “His is a new and authentic philosophical voice…. Michael Sandel’s elegantly argued book…describes what I take to be the reality of moral experience.”
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Michael J. Sandel. Cambridge University Press, Mar 28, 1998 - Philosophy. A liberal society seeks not to impose a single way of life, but to leave...
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. N. Care, Michael J. Sandel. Published 1 September 1985. Philosophy, Political Science. Noûs. A liberal society seeks not to impose a single way of life, but to leave its citizens as free as possible to choose their own values and ends.
In Liberalism and the Limits ofJustice,1 Michael Sandel offers an. intriguing critique of John Rawls' A Theory of Justice.2 Sandel's cri-. tique turns on his argument that "what issues at one end in a theory of justice must issue at the other in a theory of the person, or more pre- cisely, a theory of the moral subject."3 If from one direction ...
