Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. William McIntosh (1775 – April 30, 1825), [1] also commonly known as Tustunnuggee Hutke (White Warrior), was one of the most prominent chiefs of the Creek Nation between the turn of the 19th-century and his execution in 1825. He was a chief of Coweta town and commander of a mounted police force.

  2. 12 de oct. de 2007 · William McIntosh was a controversial chief of the Lower Creeks in early-nineteenth-century Georgia. His general support of the United States and its efforts to obtain cessions of Creek territory alienated him from many Creeks who opposed white encroachment on Indian land.

  3. McIntosh and his portrait were variously coopted over their two-hundred-year history. Ultimately, this research note reflects on the ways in which portraits function as complex indicators of racial, cultural, and regional identities and histories.

    • William McIntosh1
    • William McIntosh2
    • William McIntosh3
    • William McIntosh4
    • William McIntosh5
  4. 1 de jun. de 2023 · William McIntosh. William McIntosh (ca. 1775-1825) was a controversial nineteenth-century Creek Indian leader. A planter who owned enslaved Africans, McIntosh opposed the Red Stick majority when civil war divided the Creeks during the War of 1812. He led Creek warriors in raids on Florida Indian settlements during the First Seminole War.

  5. Details. Terms of Use. A Lower Creek Indian chief, William McIntosh was born to a Scottish father and Creek mother and was fluent in the culture and language of both Creek and white societies. He supported the United States in its efforts to obtain Creek land, and his role in the 1825 Treaty of Indian Springs was considered a betrayal by Creeks.

  6. 29 de nov. de 2019 · GPB Education. 33.6K subscribers. Subscribed. 97. 14K views 4 years ago. On this episode of Georgia Stories; Creek Indian Jay McGirt discusses William McIntosh, son of a Creek woman and a...

    • 6 min
    • 14.1K
    • GPB Education
  7. William McIntosh 19 During the ensuing months, the emotional rhetoric that char-acterized the initial response of U.S. officials to the McIntosh mur-der turned to a more rational discussion of political legitimacy and a radical reconsideration of the events that had culminated in his death. Although American observers never reached a consensus