Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › RurikidsRurikids - Wikipedia

    The Rurikids were the ruling dynasty of Kievan Rus' and its principalities following its disintegration. The Romanovichi ruled the southwestern territories, which were unified by Roman the Great and his son Daniel, who was in 1253 crowned by Pope Innocent IV as the king of Ruthenia.

  2. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › RurikRurik - Wikipedia

    The Rurikids were the ruling dynasty of Kievan Rus', and ultimately the Tsardom of Russia, until 1598, and numerous noble families claim male-line descent from Rurik. The last Rurikid to rule Russia as tsar was Vasily IV, who reigned until 1610 and was from the House of Shuysky.

  3. Riúrik o Rúrik (en ruso, Рюрик; nórdico del este Rørik, significa "famoso líder guerrero", "guerrero famoso") ( Veliki Nóvgorod 830 - Kiev 879) fue un jefe varego que ganó el control de Ládoga en 862 y construyó el asentamiento de Holmgard (Rúrikovo Gorodische) cerca de Nóvgorod, y fundó la dinastía Rúrika que gobernó la Rus de Kiev y luego Prin...

  4. Rurik Dynasty, princes of Kievan Rus and, later, Muscovy who, according to tradition, were descendants of the Varangian prince Rurik, who had been invited by the people of Novgorod to rule that city ( c. 862); the Rurik princes maintained their control over Kievan Rus and, later, Muscovy until 1598.

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
  5. Rúrikovich, dinastía Rúrika o dinastía Ruríkida (en ruso: Рюриковичи) (en ucraniano: Рюриковичі) fue la dinastía reinante en la Rus de Kiev desde 862 y en los principados sucesores de este: el Principado de Kiev, los de Hálych-Volynia (desde 1199), Vladímir-Súzdal, Moscú (desde 1168), así como en el Zarato moscovita en sus primeros tiempos.

  6. 4 de abr. de 2024 · Rurik (died ad 879) was the semilegendary founder of the Rurik dynasty of Kievan Rus. Rurik was a Viking, or Varangian, prince. His story is told in the The Russian Primary Chronicle (compiled at the beginning of the 12th century) but is not accepted at face value by modern historians.