Resultado de búsqueda
28 de may. de 2008 · This article explores this tension between rights and power under the headings of the power of rights and the rights of power. The main argument of the paper is that rights of power prevail over the power of rights almost always when strategic interests of major state actors are at stake, and this is true whether the orientation ...
- Richard Falk
- 2008
3 de jul. de 2023 · The aim of this article is to discuss the philosophical and analytical implications of the three different conceptualizations of power in the theories of Jürgen Habermas, Pierre Bourdieu, and Michel Foucault. First, the concepts of power in the three theories will be introduced. Second, follows a discussion of different elements in the three ...
- Gerd Christensen
10 de jul. de 2018 · So, rights and powers are not the same thing. When does a power become a right? Examples are difficult to come by, and are not easily distinguishable. These fall into a grey area. An example (and there could be many) is the power of a judge to grant certain orders.
19 de dic. de 2005 · Rights dominate modern understandings of what actions are permissible and which institutions are just. Rights structure the form of governments, the content of laws, and the shape of morality as many now see it.
2 de jul. de 2015 · This paper demonstrates that even the ‘powerful’ need to vernacularise rights norms and ideals when the group has no meaningful history of engaging with rights and the law. This shared process of vernacularisation highlights the plasticity of rights, and how they can be bent to serve the relatively powerful or the relatively ...
- Daniel Tagliarina
- 2015
13 de sept. de 2021 · Having laid down this fundamental principle, Bodin famously identified eight such exclusive rights—or ISFs—that he regarded as essential to sovereignty: the power to make and unmake law, the right of declaring war and peace, the right to create offices and appoint officers, the judicial right of final appeal, the power of pardon ...
Political Authority 48 describes any of the moral principles legitimizing differences between individuals' rights and duties by virtue of their relationship with the state.
