Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 14 de sept. de 1995 · Friedrich Ludwig Gottlob Frege (b. 1848, d. 1925) was a German mathematician, logician, and philosopher who worked at the University of Jena. Frege essentially reconceived the discipline of logic by constructing a formal system which, in effect, constituted the first ‘predicate calculus’.

  2. In the philosophy of language, the distinction between sense and reference was an idea of the German philosopher and mathematician Gottlob Frege in 1892 (in his paper "On Sense and Reference"; German: "Über Sinn und Bedeutung"), reflecting the two ways he believed a singular term may have meaning.

  3. The reference and sense of a sign are to be distinguished from the. [p25] associated idea. If the reference of a sign is an object perceivable by the senses, my idea of it is an internal image, [5] arising from memories of sense impressions which I have had and acts, both internal and external, which I have performed.

    • 270KB
    • 17
  4. SENSE AND REFERENCE By GOTTLOB FREGE 25 Identity1 gives rise to challenging questions which are not altogether easy to answer. Is it a relation ? A relation between objects, or between names or signs of objects? In my BegriffsschriftA I assumed the latter. The reasons which seem to favor this are the following: a=a and

  5. Summary. Frege's distinction between sense ( Sinn) and reference ( Bedeutung) has been his most influential contribution to philosophy, however central it was to his own projects, and however he may have conceived its importance.

    • Michael Kremer
    • 2010
  6. Frege’s influential theory of meaning, the theory of sense (Sinn) and reference (Bedeutung) was first outlined, albeit briefly, in his article, “Funktion und Begriff” of 1891, and was expanded and explained in greater detail in perhaps his most famous work, “Über Sinn und Bedeutung” of 1892.

  7. 5 de jun. de 2012 · Frege on Sense and reference; Michael Morris, University of Sussex; Book: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language; Online publication: 05 June 2012; Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801464.003