Resultado de búsqueda
In 1958 she developed the theory of Ideal Mental Health. Through her work Jahoda identified five categories which, she said, were vital to feelings of well-being (1982, 87). These were: time structure, social contact, collective effort or purpose, social identity or status, and regular activity.
Jahoda contribuyó al análisis de los Estudios sobre el prejuicio y fue coeditora del tercer volumen de estos estudios llamado Antisemitismo y trastorno emocional: una interpretación psicológica, publicada en 1950. Entre 1958 y 1965 participó en el establecimiento de programas de grado en Psicología en lo que hoy es la ...
As stated above, the idea of positive mental health was developed by Jahoda. According to Jahoda (1953), positive mental health could be viewed as an “enduring” personality trait or as a less permanent function of personality. Her six approaches to positive mental health are still widely used today.
Poco después, en 1958, la psicóloga social Marie Jahoda publica su famosa sistematización de salud mental positiva en EE.UU.- creada a instancias de la Joint Commissiob on Mental Illness and Health-, que ha sido ampliamente difuncida, simplificada, y que sin duda constituye la referencia más evidente de todas las definiciones posteriores.
- Gonzalo Miranda Hiriart
- 2018
Marie Jahoda was born in Vienna, Austria, in 1907 to an upper-middle-class, secular Jewish family. Jahoda’s parents were active Social Democrats and Jahoda became a leader in the Austrian socialist youth movement. Her upbringing was intensely political, and her political activities and convictions had a major impact on the course of her ...
Policies and ethics. In this chapter I discuss Marie Jahoda’s classic study, Current Concepts of Positive Mental Health, published in 1958. The book is a summary of most of the views on mental health found in the relevant literature at the time, and it is therefore a great source...
28 de sept. de 2020 · Marie Jahoda, who died in 2001 at the age of 94, was a great user of examples in her work, and she believed that psychologists constantly over-valued theory. She sets standards of writing and of intellectual humanity that psychologists today would do well to follow.
