Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

  1. Cerca de 5.470 resultados de búsqueda
  1. Anuncios
    relacionados con: House of Hasan-Jalalyan wikipedia
  2. 100,000+ usuarios visitaron us.searchley.com el mes pasado

    Search We Buy Houses Dc, Top Information From Trusted Internet Sources. We Buy Houses Dc, Get Expert Advice and Curated Content on Searchley

  1. The House of Hasan-Jalalyan (Armenian: Հասան-Ջալալյաններ) was an Armenian dynasty that ruled the region of Khachen (Greater Artsakh) from 1214 onwards in what are now the regions of lower Karabakh, Nagorno-Karabakh and small part of Syunik.

    • Allahverdi II Hasan-Jalalyan
    • Artsakh
    • Country
    • Deletion of Verifiable Info by Marshall
    • Haykaz Vakhtangian?
    • Hasan-Jala... Autonomous Leader?
    • Gan on Hold
    • Proposed Move
    • NPOV of This article?
    • Assessment Comment

    Marshall, please stop POV editing. There was no country called Armenia in the 13th century. The fact that you readded inaccurate info shows that you take confrontational approach. I don't think there's any need of doing that. Grandmaster05:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 1. Doesn't accusing people of POV accusations get tiring after a while? I already distinguished the fact that I'm not referring to it as a country per se; however if you find any map of the Caucasus from the 1300s onwards, you're going to find the general region labeled as "Armenia". , , , , , etc. 1. There may have been several fully independent Armenian kingdoms but travelers for centuries on end called it by no other name but Armenia.--MarshallBagramyan05:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 1. 1.1. Karabakh was not Armenia. It was part of regions of Arran or Azerbaijan. If you are refering to a region, it should be Albania/Arran. Grandmaster05:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 1. 1.1. Also, Ulubabian is not a good source. It is a modern Armenian na...

    Marshall, do not delete the info about ancestry of Hasan-Jalal. It is verifiable info that should remain in the article. What is your problem with mentioning all the ancestors of this house? And we have unresolved issue about the country where Khachen was located and whether or not 5 meliks of Karabakh were descendants of Hasan-Jalal’s house. Until those issues are resolved, the tags should remain. Grandmaster06:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC) And put your arguments here so we will be able to discuss.--Dacy6915:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 1. I restored the info about the origins of the dynasty, which was deleted by Marshall and which he failed to discuss here on the talk page. --Grandmaster 07:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1.1. Sigh ... it's sad to see such sad and desperate blind reverts. Did you actually see what you were reverting? Balk is a territory in Afghanistan, Baghk is an Armenian region in Artsakh and Syunik. As for list of descendants of Dola, I said to you dear friend, create an Article...

    I want to know more about the alleged real name of Hasan Jalal - Haykaz/Haykazi (Հայկազ?). You may send me a personal message or develop on that topic right here. Merjanov (talk) 17:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

    The title inknakal (ինքնակալ) was translated "self-ruling or autonomous leader". That seems to be fault. It must be autocrat or absolute sovereign / ruler / monarch. (source: Ժամանակակից հայոց լեզվի բացատրական բառարան, հատոր Բ, էջ 325։"Ինքնակալ - Միահեծան թագավոր՝ որի իրավունքները չեն սահմանափակված"). Vacio (talk) 09:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

    Sorry for the long wait! 1. Please move all free images to Commons so other projects can use them (I can help with this if you need) 2. "in what is" --> "in what are" (plural) 3. Origins of the dynasty section should be ==L2== 4. "According to Robert H. Hewsen..." - the following quote is sourced to Thomas de Waal, am I missing something? 5. "and prosperity until the appearance of the Mongols" - might want to say when this was, otherwise it doesn't make as much sense as it could 6. "The image of Hasan-Jalal on the drum of Gandzasar's dome has him sitting cross-legged, which Eastmond remarks was a "predominant device for depicting power at the Seljuq court."" - is this only one man's opinion, or is there generally some idea attached to one sitting cross-legged? 7. "Gandzasar also became home to" - don't start a section with "also" 8. "and the document issued by the khan failed to uphold its promises." - probably needs a reference 9. "however, died on the way as" - I think "as" should...

    Since this article is supposed to be about both Hasan-Jalal Dawla and his dynasty, it would seem logical that the title of the article should be moved to Melik-Hasan-Jalalyan, just like the other four melik families that controlled the region (e.g., Melik-Beglaryan, Melik-Shahnazaryan, etc.) Does anyone have objections to such a move?--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 04:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1. I do. This dynasty emerged in the 13th c. as the senior line of the House of Khachen, while the princes of Karabakh used the title "melik" only in the 16th century. Besides the Hasan-Jalalyans continued to exist as a noble familiy after 1828 when th mdom of Khachen came to an end. Even today there are many peoply both in NK, Am and the Am diaspora who belong to this family. --Vacio (talk) 12:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2. I concur. They were around long before the title of 'melik' came to be.--Ευπάτωρ Talk!!17:25, 4 January 2009 (UTC) I agree with Eupator and Vacio. Capasitor (talk) 03:51, 17 Janu...

    Hello. How is this NPOV? The Hasan-Jalalyan family was able to maintain its autonomy throughout several centuries of foreign domination of the region by Seljuk Turks, Persians and Mongols as they, as well as the other Armenian princes and meliks of Khachen, saw themselves of holding the last bastion of Armenian independence in the region. I understand its an Armenian topic/subject, but what is written above is simply not a neutral point of view. If an invader is stronger and wants the region, he gets it, simple as that. Mainting autonomyshould be changed in something neutral. Regards - LouisAragon (talk) 23:25, 19 May 2015 (UTC) 1. It's not always as simple as that. Some powers, however strong, feel it more prudent to strike deals or make arrangements with minor potentates, not wanting to waste resources and men in reducing fortified positions if, in exchange for autonomy, they receive taxes and loyalty. History abounds with such examples. Even the Armenians in Greater Armenia were...

    The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:House of Hasan-Jalalyan/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section. Last edited at 18:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC).Substituted at 20:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

  2. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Wikien.wikipedia.org

    en.wikipedia.org

  3. The House of Hasan-Jalalyan (Armenian: Հասան-Ջալալյաններ) was an Armenian dynasty[1][2] that ruled the region of Khachen (Greater Artsakh) from 1214 onwards in what are now the regions of lower Karabakh, Nagorno-Karabakh and small part of Syunik.[3]

  4. The House of Hasan-Jalalyan (Armenian: Հասան-Ջալալյաններ) was an Armenian dynasty [1] [2] that ruled the region of Khachen (Greater Artsakh) from 1214 onwards in what are now the regions of lower Karabakh, Nagorno-Karabakh and small part of Syunik. [3]

  5. The House of Hasan-Jalalyan (Armenian: Հասան-Ջալալյաններ) was an Armenian dynasty that ruled the region of Khachen (Greater Artsakh) from 1214 onwards in what are now the regions of lower Karabakh, Nagorno-Karabakh and small part of Syunik.

  6. The House of Hasan-Jalalyan (Armenian: Հասան-Ջալալյաններ) was an Armenian dynasty that ruled the region of Khachen (Greater Artsakh) from 1214 onwards in what are now the regions of lower Karabakh,

  1. Anuncios
    relacionados con: House of Hasan-Jalalyan wikipedia