Resultado de búsqueda
14 de may. de 2024 · Abstract. On the surface of things, Scandinavia might appear as a quiet corner during Europe’s years of revolution in 1848–1849. Yet, as this chapter demonstrates, beneath this surface was a cauldron of constitutional and national issues that raised fundamental questions about Scandinavia’s future. As the end of absolutism and a regime ...
14 de may. de 2024 · Taken as a whole, the 1850s were a harmonious time for the Swedish-Norwegian union, a harmony brought about in part by the upsurge of Scandinavianism after 1856. This may, however, best reflect the degree of conflict in the union in the first few decades after its inception in 1814 and before its dissolution in 1905.
14 de may. de 2024 · A specific proposal for constitutional reform was prepared in 1830 by two parliamentarians, Carl Henrik Anckarsvärd and Johan Gabriel Richert. The demand for a parliamentary reform according to the Norwegian model was also expressed by several parliamentary peasants and not least by Hierta, who campaigned for it in the 1830s and 1840s.
14 de may. de 2024 · The election on 21 August 1810 of the Marshal Jean Baptiste Bernadotte as crown prince Charles John of Sweden came about through an unlikely turn of events. An unsolicited approach by the 28-year-old Swedish lieutenant Otto Mörner on a diplomatic mission to Paris in mid-June to sound out Napoleon’s opinion on the Duke of Augustenburg alerted Bernadotte to a window of opportunity.
14 de may. de 2024 · The most significant change can be seen in the Swede, Johan August Gripenstedt. As newly appointed minister in 1848, he worked to persuade the Swedes to go to war in support of Denmark, while in 1863 he prevented an alliance between Sweden-Norway and Denmark, and in 1864 played his part in ensuring the breakdown of negotiations for a union.
14 de may. de 2024 · In 1850, the editor of the liberal newspaper Aftonbladet, Lars Johan Hierta predicted that Scandinavianism would eventually end up in the service of reaction. The estate owner and politician Emil Key left the movement because he felt that it had become too elitist and had deprived itself of the opportunity to be a movement that was closer to the people and more in favour of reform.
