Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Philippe of Lorraine (1643 – 8 December 1702), known as the Chevalier de Lorraine, was a French nobleman, descendant of the Dukes of Elbeuf, member of the House of Guise, cadet branch of the House of Lorraine. He was the renowned lover of Philippe I, Duke of Orléans, brother of Louis XIV.

  2. Philippe de Lorraine, dit le « chevalier de Lorraine », né en 1643 et mort le 7 décembre 1702, fils cadet d'Henri de Lorraine, comte d'Harcourt et de Marguerite Philippe du Cambout, est un gentilhomme français, membre de la Maison de Lorraine, favori et mignon du duc d'Orléans, Monsieur, frère du roi Louis XIV.

    • 1643, Lieu inconnu
  3. Philippe of Lorraine, called the Chevalier de Lorraine (1643 – 8 December 1702) was a French noble man and member of the House of Guise, cadet of the Ducal house of Lorraine. He was the renowned lover of Philippe , Monsieur, brother of Louis XIV of France .

  4. Felipe de Lorena (1643 - París, Francia, 8 de diciembre de 1702) 1 fue un noble francés y miembro de la Casa de Guisa, perteneciente a la estirpe principesca-ducal de Lorena. Fue el amante más famoso del duque Felipe I de Orleans, hermano del rey Luis XIV de Francia . Primeros años.

  5. Philippe of Lorraine (1643 – 8 December 1702), known as the Chevalier de Lorraine, was a French nobleman and member of the House of Guise, cadet of the Ducal House of Lorraine. He was the renowned lover of Philippe of France, Duke of Orléans, Monsieur, only brother of Louis XIV.

    • 1643
    • Alexandre, Chevalier de Beauvernois
    • 8 December 1702, Paris, France
    • Guise
  6. Philippe of Lorraine (1643 – 8 December 1702), known as the Chevalier de Lorraine, was a French nobleman and member of the House of Guise, cadet of the Ducal House of Lorraine. He was the renowned lover of Philippe I, Duke of Orléans, brother of Louis XIV.

  7. 2 de may. de 2021 · His intense romantic relationship with the Chevalier de Lorraine, his interest and expertise in make-up and fashion, and his successes as a military leader, are not treated as paradoxical, as some historians have problematically implied, but simply as parts of a whole.