Resultado de búsqueda
4 de ene. de 2002 · “The Federalist No. 85, [28 May 1788],” Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0248. [Original source: The Papers of Alexander Hamilton , vol. 4, January 1787 – May 1788 , ed. Harold C. Syrett.
Federalist No. 85 es un ensayo de Alexander Hamilton, el ochenta y cinco y último de The Federalist Papers. Fue publicado el 13 y 16 de agosto de 1788 bajo el seudónimo Publius, el nombre bajo el cual se publicaron todos los documentos de The Federalist. El título es " Observaciones finales ".
- Estados Unidos
- Inglés
- Concluding Remarks
Federalist No. 85 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the eighty-fifth and last of The Federalist Papers. It was published on August 13 and 16, 1788, under the pseudonym Publius , the name under which all The Federalist papers were published.
- Alexander Hamilton
- English
- United States
- Concluding Remarks
27 de ene. de 2016 · If, on the contrary, the Constitution proposed should once be ratified by all the States as it stands, alterations in it may at any time be effected by nine States. Here, then, the chances are as thirteen to nine in favor of subsequent amendment, rather than of the original adoption of an entire system. This is not all.
Federalist No. 85 es un ensayo de Alexander Hamilton, el ochenta y cinco y último de The Federalist Papers. Fue publicado el 13 y 16 de agosto de 1788 bajo el seudónimo Publius, el nombre bajo el cual se publicaron todos los documentos de The Federalist. El título es "Observaciones finales".
Federalist Number (No.) 85 (1788) is an essay by British-American politician Alexander Hamilton arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution. The full title of the essay is "Concluding Remarks." It was written as part of a series of essays collected and published in 1788 as The Federalist and later known as The Federalist Papers.
Federalist No. 85 offers a synopsis of the overall case for the Constitution. Describing the dangers of a nation without a national government as an "awful spectacle > " the paper provides a rebuttal to the active opposition to ratification.
