Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Jahān Shāh (died 1467) was the leader (c. 1438–67) of the Turkmen Kara Koyunlu (“Black Sheep”) in Azerbaijan. Under Jahān Shāhs rule the Kara Koyunlu extended their domain over Iraq , Fārs, and Eṣfahān (1453).

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
  2. Overview. Shāh Jahān. (1592—1666) Quick Reference. (1592–1666) Mogul Emperor of India (1628–58). He extended Mogul power, notably in the Deccan, and rebuilt the capital at Delhi. His buildings there and in Agra, notably the Taj Mahal, built as a shrine for his wife, mark the peak of Indo-Muslim architecture.

  3. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Qara_QoyunluQara Qoyunlu - Wikipedia

    Etymology. The name Qara Qoyunlu literally means " [those with] black sheep". [13] It has been suggested that this name refers to old totemic symbols, but according to Rashid al-Din Hamadani, the Turks were forbidden to eat the flesh of their totem-animals, and so this is unlikely given the importance of mutton in the diet of pastoral nomads.

  4. The colouring is jewel-like in its brilliance, and the outward splendour quite dazzling. The best work is found in the Shāhjahānnāmeh (“History of Shāh Jahān”) of the Windsor Castle Library and in several albums assembled for the emperor

  5. Overview. Shāh Jahān. (1592—1666) Quick Reference. (1592–1666) Mogul Emperor of India (1628–58). He extended Mogul power, notably in the Deccan, and rebuilt the capital at Delhi. His buildings there and in Agra, notably the Taj Mahal, built as a shrine for his wife, mark the peak of Indo-Muslim architecture.

  6. In addition to historical paintings of the prior ruler, this manuscript also represents probable eunuchs proximate to Shāh Jahān himself in audience scenes, particularly positioned slightly below the emperor bearing fans and fly whisks, reinforcing the architectural distinction between imperial space and the space occupied by the nobles.

  7. 1 de dic. de 2022 · Also mentioned is the influence of Shāh Jahān on reshaping the narrative of his father’s reign and their own falling out, placing much of the blame on Nūr Jahān (pp. 10–11). An interesting facet of these memoirs, though not discussed here, involves their reception and circulation in the seventeenth century.