Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Wenzel Anton, Prince of Kaunitz-Rietberg (German: Wenzel Anton Reichsfürst von Kaunitz-Rietberg, Czech: Václav Antonín z Kounic a Rietbergu; 2 February 1711 – 27 June 1794) was an Austrian and Czech diplomat and statesman in the Habsburg monarchy.

    • Count Anton Corfiz Ulfeldt
  2. Wenzel Anton Graf Kaunitz-Rietberg, ab 1764 Reichsfürst von Kaunitz-Rietberg (* 2. Februar 1711 in Wien; † 27. Juni 1794 in Mariahilf, damals noch Vorstadt von Wien), war österreichischer Staatsmann des aufgeklärten Absolutismus, Reichshofrat und Diplomat .

  3. Estatua de Wenzel Anton Graf Kaunitz. Wenzel Anton von Kaunitz-Rietberg , conde y príncipe de Kaunitz ( Viena , 2 de febrero de 1711 - 27 de junio de 1794), fue un estadista austríaco. Fue canciller de Estado durante los reinados de María Teresa I y José II .

    • 27 de junio de 1794 (83 años), Viena (Monarquía Habsburgo)
    • Austríaca
    • Wenzel Anton Kaunitz
  4. 18 de mar. de 2024 · Wenzel Anton von Kaunitz, Austrian state chancellor from the Seven Years’ War (1756–63) to the beginning of the wars against Revolutionary France (1792). He was responsible for Habsburg foreign policy, and he served as principal adviser on foreign affairs to the empress Maria Theresa and her successors.

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
  5. 16 de abr. de 2024 · Kaunitz, Wenzel Anton, Graf von (1711–94) (1711–94)Austrian diplomat and statesman. As Chancellor (1753–92) he controlled foreign policy under Empress Maria Theresa and Emperor Joseph II. He was convinced that Prussia was Austria's most dangerous enemy and his main diplomatic feat was to reverse (1756–57) long-standing ...

  6. Estatua de Wenzel Anton Graf Kaunitz. Wenzel Anton von Kaunitz-Rietberg, conde y príncipe de Kaunitz ( Viena 2 de febrero 1711 27 de junio 1794 ), fue un estadista austríaco. Fue canciller de Estado durante los reinados de María Teresa I José II.

  7. 16 de dic. de 2008 · Wenzel Anton von Kaunitz-Rittberg is generally recognized as the principal architect of the “Diplomatic Revolution” of 1756 and as one of the greatest statesmen of his day, yet there have been curiously few attempts to describe and analyze the process by which he rose to such eminence.