Resultado de búsqueda
Hugh served William fitzEmpress, the brother of King Henry II of England from the mid 1150s. William gave Hugh the manor of Harrietsham in Kent. After William's death in 1164, Hugh passed into royal service, while also serving as seneschal to the new Earl of Surrey, Hamelin, the illegitimate half-brother of King Henry II.
Empress Matilda ( c. 7 February 1102 – 10 September 1167), also known as the Empress Maude, [nb 1] was one of the claimants to the English throne during the civil war known as the Anarchy. The daughter and heir of Henry I, king of England and ruler of Normandy, she went to Germany as a child when she was married to the future Holy Roman ...
Family Tree - William of Anjou ROYAL FAMILY TREE ... William FitzEmpress; Lived 27 years, 6 months, 8 days; father. Geoffrey V; 1113 - 1151; mother. Matilda; 1102 - 1167;
When William d'Anjou Count of Poitou was born on 22 July 1136, in Argentan, Orne, Lower Normandy, France, his father, Geoffrey Plantagenet Count of Anjou, was 22 and his mother, Matilda of England Holy Roman Empress, was 34. He died on 30 January 1164, in Archdiocese of Rouen, France, at the age of 27, and was buried in Archdiocese of Rouen ...
William Tournemine Fitzempresse 1136-1164 Family Tree owner : mdecreton This user is a Premium member who get advantage of advanced features and options: more search criteria, unlimited access to the collections, hints and email alerts for finding new information and ancestors, etc.
William FitzEmpress (22 July 1136 – 30 January 1164) or William Longespee was the youngest of the three sons of Empress Matilda and Geoffrey Plantagenet, Count of Anjou. His brothers were Henry II of England and Geoffrey, Count of Nantes . This page uses content from the English Wikipedia. The original content was at William FitzEmpress.
The seal of William FitzEmpress, John’s uncle, clearly shows that as early as the 1150s members of the English royal house not only caparisoned their steeds, but also repeated their shield devices upon those caparisons. 35 Speed (or perhaps his engraver) could hardly have been aware of this fact, and so by making what was to his near contemporary a glaringly apparent mistake, he was in fact ...
