Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 14 de may. de 2024 · Julia Kristeva, Powers of Horror, 1982 Embarrassment, a possibility in every face-to-face encounter, demonstrates some generic properties of interaction. It occurs whenever an individual is felt to have projected incompatible definitions of himself before those present.

  2. 26 de abr. de 2024 · Creed also borrows from Julia Kristevas essay on abjection featured in “Powers of Horror.” Kristevas theory directly influenced Creed’s concept of the possessed woman, providing an explanation for extreme human behavior when faced with a blurred identity that conflates the self and the “other.”

  3. Hace 1 día · Kristeva, Julia (14 May 1984) [First published 1980 in French as Pouvoirs de l'horreur by Éditions du Seuil]. Powers of Horror. Translated by Roudiez, Leon S. (Reprinted ed.). Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-05347-1. OCLC 8430152. McElroy, Wendy (31 May 2001). Sexual Correctness: The Gender-Feminist Attack on Women.

  4. Hace 3 días · The scene’s sickening images of blood, sweat, and tears provoke horror in the reader and “a massive and sudden emergence of uncanniness,” as Julia Kristeva defines the abject (2). The uncanny in this crucial moment manifests in a feeling of disorientation and existential dread.

  5. Hace 6 días · As Kristeva examines in her book Powers of Horror: an Essay on Abjection, the perversion of criminality is aligned with the abject. Therefore, for Briony, sexual intercourse is perceived as an abject, Gothic act.

  6. 14 de may. de 2024 · Materia: PSICOLOGÍA. ISBN: 978-950-557-333-2. Con el soporte de su experiencia como psicoanalista, Kristeva plantea y define su propósito intelectual: la alternativa al «nuevo orden mundial» se basa en la reactivación del «espíritu de revuelta».

  7. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › The_RealThe Real - Wikipedia

    14 de may. de 2024 · Julia Kristeva, particularly in her 1980 essay Powers of Horror, posits that the super-ego's abjection facilitates a subjective traumatic limit between subject and objects, with the Real, through ego-object loss and castration of surplus jouissance.