Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Konstantin Nikolayevich Leontiev, monastic name: Clement [1] ( Russian: Константи́н Никола́евич Лео́нтьев; 25 January 1831 – 24 November 1891) was a conservative tsarist and imperial monarchist Russian philosopher who advocated closer cultural ties between Russia and the East against what he believed to be the West's catastrophic egalitarian, ut...

  2. Konstantín Leóntiev. Apariencia. ocultar. Konstantín Nikoláievich Leóntiev ( Kudínovo, gobernación de Kaluga, 13 de enero jul. / 25 de enero de 1831 greg. - Sérguiev Posad, 12 de noviembre jul. / 24 de noviembre de 1891 greg.) fue un filósofo y diplomático ruso . Biografía.

  3. 12 de feb. de 2024 · Leóntiev, un pensador en la encrucijada – Rebelion. Por Andrei Zworykin | 12/02/2024 | Opinión. Fuentes: Katheon. Traducido del ruso por Juan Gabriel Caro Rivera. Konstantin Nikolaevich...

  4. MOSTRAR TODAS LAS PREGUNTAS. Konstantín Nikoláievich Leóntiev ( Kudínovo, gobernación de Kaluga, 13 de enero jul. / 25 de enero de 1831 greg. - Sérguiev Posad, 12 de noviembre jul. / 24 de noviembre de 1891 greg.) fue un filósofo y diplomático ruso. Konstantín Leóntiev. Información personal. Nacimiento. 13 de enero de 1831 jul ...

  5. There can have been few Russian thinkers and writers as consistently misunderstood as Konstantin Nikolaevich Leontiev. During his lifetime he was generally considered to be a Slavophile, which he was not, and this myth flourished for a hundred years after his death in 1891 and is alive even today.

  6. 21 de mar. de 2024 · Konstantin Nikolayevich Leontyev (born Jan. 25 [Jan. 13, old style], 1831, Kudinovo, near Kaluga, Russia—died Nov. 24 [Nov. 12, O.S.], 1891, near Moscow) was a Russian essayist who questioned the benefits derived by Russia from following contemporary industrial and egalitarian developments in Europe. A military surgeon in the ...

  7. This is a new English-language intellectual biography of Konstantin Leontiev (1831–1891), a thinker and writer whose place in Russian intellectual history remains ambiguous and controversial. Previous attempts to pinpoint his ideas on a larger intellectual map have produced a variety of expressive labels.