Resultado de búsqueda
Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione (Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect) is an unfinished work of philosophy by the seventeenth-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza, published posthumously in 1677.
The Tractatns de Intellectiis Emendatione., written. probably before Spinoza was thirty years old, is so. important not only historically, as showing how. gradually and consecutively what he had to tell the world was revealed to him, but for its own intrinsic worth, that no excuse is necessary for the attempt.
1. Tratado sobre la reforma del entendimiento. Su título completo original es " Tractatus de intellectus emendatione et de via qua optime in veram rerum cognitionem dirigitur ". Es una obra inacabada, escrita entre 1657 y 1660, en la que Spinoza expone su teoría del conocimiento.
13 de feb. de 2008 · Tractatus de intellectus emendatione : et de via, qua optime in veram rerum cognitionem dirigitur : Spinoza, Benedictus de, 1632-1677 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive. by. Spinoza, Benedictus de, 1632-1677; Hale-White, William, Sir, 1857-1949; Stirling, Amelia Hutchison. Publication date. 1895. Topics. Intellect. Publisher.
5 de sept. de 2008 · Tractatus theologico-politicus Compendium grammatices linguae hebraeae [googlebooks] Supplementum [Van Floten, ed.] (Amsterdam, 1862) Tractatus brevis/Korte Verhandeling Collectanea ad vitam spinozae Epistolae [googlebooks] C. Rudolf W. Meier's page html versions of: Ethica ordine geometrica demonstrata, Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione ...
written by Jarigh Jelles) the Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione was an early work which Spinoza always intended to complete but which he was prevented from completing by the pressure of his other works, by the inherent difficulty of the subject, and finally by his untimely death. The only apparent reference to the work occurs in.
Benedict Spinoza’s Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect (Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione) is a youthful work with the typical virtues and flaws one could expect from such a piece.1 Though the main focus of the treatise is on issues of philosophical methodology, the work opens with strong existentialist undertones:
