Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 9 de dic. de 2011 · The book examines where this conflict is supposed to exist—evolution, evolutionary psychology, analysis of scripture, scientific study of religionas well as claims by Dan Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Philip Kitcher that evolution and theistic belief cannot co-exist.

    • Alvin Plantinga
  2. Oxford University Press, USA, Dec 9, 2011 - Philosophy - 359 pages. This book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, Alvin Plantinga, on one of our biggest debates...

    • 0199812098, 9780199812097
    • Alvin Plantinga
    • Oxford University Press, USA, 2011
  3. 15 de jun. de 2012 · Alvin Plantinga, Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism, Oxford University Press, 2011, 359pp., $27.95 (hbk), ISBN 9780199812097. Reviewed by Paul Draper, Purdue University. 2012.06.15. "There is superficial conflict but deep concord between science and religion, in particular theistic religion, and ...

  4. 9 de dic. de 2011 · Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism 1st Edition. This book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, Alvin Plantinga, on one of our biggest debates -- the compatibility of science and religion.

    • (256)
    • Alvin Plantinga
    • $36.99
    • Oxford University Press
  5. 11 de jul. de 2023 · Where the conflict really lies : science, religion, and naturalism : Plantinga, Alvin : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive. by. Plantinga, Alvin. Publication date. 2011. Topics. Religion and science, Evolution (Biology) -- Religious aspects -- Christianity, Naturalism -- Religious aspects -- Christianity. Publisher.

  6. 1 de ago. de 2011 · In this long-awaited book, pre-eminent analytical philosopher Alvin Plantinga argues that the conflict between science and theistic religion is actually superficial, and that at a...

  7. 5 de ago. de 2012 · In Where the Conflict Really Lies, Alvin Plantinga sets out to demonstrate that, appearances to the contrary, there is no real conflict between science and (theistic) religion. While there are areas of superficial or apparent incompatibility, underneath we find a deep concord.