Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Wikipedia article References. Arthur Hughes (27 January 1832 – 22 December 1915) was an English painter and illustrator associated with the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. Hughes was born in London. In 1846 he entered the art school at Somerset House, his first master being Alfred Stevens, and later entered the Royal Academy schools.

  2. Arthur Hughes, né le 27 janvier 1831 à Londres et mort le 23 décembre 1915 à Kew, est un peintre et illustrateur anglais associé au mouvement préraphaélique . Ses deux œuvres les plus connues sont Amour d'avril et The Long Engagement. Il a aussi peint une Ophelia - comme John Everett Millais, qu’il imite.

  3. Artist: Arthur Hughes (British, 1832-1915) Date: about 1865. Dimensions: H: 37 5/16 in. (94.8 cm); W: 23 3/16 in. (58.9 cm) Medium: Oil on canvas. Classification: Paintings. Credit Line: Purchased with funds from the Libbey Endowment, Gift of Edward Drummond Libbey. Object number: 1952.87. Label Text: The sad madness and death of Ophelia in ...

  4. 20 de jun. de 2008 · Ophelia, Arthur Hughes The above depiction by Hughes is a bit faerie-like and elfish but Hughes was not done with our beloved Ophelia yet, it seems. He painted her again, this time depicting her in the moments of madness before she reaches the stream.

  5. Ophelia ("And He Will Not Come Back Again") 1865. by Arthur Hughes. ... Arthur Hughes Artist. Follow 8 followers. Belongs to. Toledo Museum of Art Museum (United States)

  6. 14 de jun. de 2021 · Description: In contrast to lighter versions of Ophelia, such as Millais's painting showing her floating in a delicately embroidered dress surrounded by lush green plant life, Hughes's painting has a much darker setting: the dark swampy woodland reflects Ophelia’s sadness as she sits forlorn by the water ahead of her impending death. The ...

  7. Arthur Hughes. Ophelia. 1852. Oil on panel [?]. 27 x 48 3/4 inches. Manchester City Art Gallery. Commentary by The Art-Journal (1865). Mr. Ruskin, in his "Notes on some of the Principal Pictures exhibited at the Royal Academy" in 1858, speaks inferentially of this artist as one of the "leaders" of the Pre-Raffaellite school, and reprobates the absence of the rest from the gallery.