Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Larry_SangerLarry Sanger - Wikipedia

    Since his departure in 2002, Sanger has been critical of Wikipedia, its policies and administrators, and the Wikimedia Foundation. In 2015, Vice referred to Sanger as "Wikipedia's Most Outspoken Critic". Accuracy, credibility and expertise

  2. 30 de jun. de 2021 · Wikipedia Is More One-Sided Than Ever – LarrySanger.org. June 30, 2021. Some animals are more equal than others. “All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia,” declares a policy page, “must be written from a neutral point of view ( NPOV ).” This is essential policy, believe it or not.

  3. Larry Sanger, cofundador de Wikipedia, dejó este espacio para desarrollar Citizendium. La Wikipedia ha sido criticada por permitir la publicación en sus artículos de materiales visuales de contenido sexual, como imágenes y videos de masturbación y eyaculación, así como escenas de películas pornográficas.

  4. Larry Sanger. Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, has been critical of Wikipedia since he was laid off as the only editorial employee and departed from the project in 2002. He went on to found and work for competitors to Wikipedia, including Citizendium and Everipedia.

  5. El cofundador de Wikipedia Sanger es el crítico más abierto de Wikipedia: «La gente que yo diría que son trolls se hizo cargo. Los presos empezaron a dirigir el manicomio». [6] Tras salir de la Wikipedia volvió a la Universidad Ohio State, donde obtuvo el doctorado en filosofía. [7]

  6. By 2006, after the launch of Citizendium, Sanger was harshly critical of Wikipedia, describing it as "broken beyond repair." In 2005, Wales described himself simply as the founder of Wikipedia; however, according to Brian Bergstein of the Associated Press, "Sanger has long been cited as a co-founder."

  7. 26 de abr. de 2022 · Larry Sanger created Wikipedia with co-founder Jimmy Wales. Sanger left Wikipedia in 2002 and has been critical of the website since then, alleging issues with the management of the site, a “dysfunctional community” of contributors, and error-filled content.