Resultado de búsqueda
16 de jul. de 2021 · Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has warned that the website can no longer be trusted — insisting it is now just “propaganda” for the left-leaning “establishment.”
I knew Wikipedia was heavily biased. The moment I knew it was was when I read the GamerGate page. It’s a movement that lasted for 2 years (2014-2015) and has been running in the background. The website could have presented both sides, their motivations and the criticism against them while being neutral.
In 2021, Wikipedia denied accusations made by Larry Sanger of having a particular political bias, with a spokesperson for the encyclopedia saying that third-party studies have shown that its editors come from a variety of ideological viewpoints and that "As more people engage in the editing process on Wikipedia, the more neutral ...
Since 2020, he has criticized Wikipedia for what he perceives as a left-wing and liberal ideological bias in its articles. [8] [9] In 2006, he founded Citizendium to compete with Wikipedia. In 2010, he stepped down as editor-in-chief. In 2020, he left Citizendium entirely. In 2017, he joined Everipedia as chief information officer (CTO).
- Lawrence Mark Sanger, July 16, 1968 (age 55), Bellevue, Washington, U.S.
- Internet project developer, philosopher
16 de ago. de 2022 · Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger conducted his own bias analysis of the website, saying Wikipedia is “badly biased.” "The days of Wikipedia's robust commitment to neutrality are long gone," co-founder Larry Sanger told Fox News in Feb. 2021.
30 de jun. de 2021 · For these reasons, it is not too far to say that Wikipedia, like many other deeply biased institutions of our brave new digital world, has made itself into a kind of thought police that has de facto shackled conservative viewpoints with which they disagree.
26 de abr. de 2022 · It is, however, correct. Larry Sanger created Wikipedia with co-founder Jimmy Wales. Sanger leftWikipedia in 2002 and has been critical of the website since then, alleging issues with the management of the site, a “dysfunctional community” of contributors, and error-filled content.
