Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Philip IV (Spanish: Felipe Domingo Victor de la Cruz de Austria y Austria, [1] Portuguese: Filipe; 8 April 1605 – 17 September 1665), also called the Planet King (Spanish: Rey Planeta ), was King of Spain from 1621 to his death and (as Philip III) King of Portugal from 1621 to 1640.

  2. 2 de abr. de 2024 · Philip IV. Byname: Philip the Fair. French: Philippe le Bel. Born: 1268, Fontainebleau, France. Died: November 29, 1314, Fontainebleau (aged 46) Title / Office: king (1285-1314), France. House / Dynasty: Capetian dynasty. Notable Family Members: spouse Joan I. daughter Isabella of France. On the Web:

  3. 4 de abr. de 2024 · Philip IV (born April 8, 1605, Valladolid, Spain—died Sept. 17, 1665, Madrid) was the king of Spain (1621–65) and of Portugal (1621–40), during the decline of Spain as a great world power.

  4. Philip IV (April–June 1268 – 29 November 1314), called Philip the Fair ( French: Philippe le Bel ), was King of France from 1285 to 1314. By virtue of his marriage with Joan I of Navarre, he was also King of Navarre as Philip I from 1284 to 1305, as well as Count of Champagne.

  5. www.britannica.com › summary › Philip-IV-king-of-FrancePhilip IV summary | Britannica

    Philip IV, French Philippe known as Philip the Fair, (born 1268, Fontainebleau, France—died Nov. 29, 1314, Fontainebleau), King of France (1285–1314). On inheriting the French throne, he modeled himself on his grandfather, Louis IX. He was also king of Navarre (as Philip I, 1284–1305), ruling jointly with his wife, Joan I of Navarre.

  6. 23 de may. de 2018 · PHILIP IV (SPAIN) (1605 – 1665), king of Spain (1621 – 1665). Philip, his father Philip III (1578 – 1621), and his son Charles II (1661 – 1700) are sometimes known as the "minor Habsburgs" to differentiate them from their sixteenth-century predecessors.

  7. PHILIP IV, KING OF FRANCE. Reigned 1285 to 1314, called the Fair; b. Fontainebleau, 1268; d. Fontainebleau, Nov. 29, 1314. Philip brought the French monarchy to new heights of power, yet many of his contemporaries and some modern scholars assert that his ministers deserve all the credit (or blame) for his policies.