Resultado de búsqueda
t. e. In semantics, the best-known types of semantic equivalence are dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence (two terms coined by Eugene Nida ), which employ translation approaches that focus, respectively, on conveying the meaning of the source text; and that lend greater importance to preserving, in the translation, the literal ...
- Dynamic and formal equivalence
Dynamic and formal equivalence. Dynamic and formal...
- Formal equivalence checking
Formal equivalence checking process is a part of electronic...
- Dynamic and formal equivalence
14 de sept. de 2021 · Formal equivalence is a literal, word-for-word translation. The goal is to stay as close to the original text as possible. The translation will preserve the lexical details, grammatical structure, vocabulary, and syntax of the source text.
"Formal equivalence" (sought via "literal" translation) attempts to render the text literally, or "word for word" (the latter expression being itself a word-for-word rendering of the classical Latin verbum pro verbo) – if necessary, at the expense of features natural to the target language.
La equivalencia dinámica (también conocida como equivalencia funcional) intenta comunicar la idea expresada en el texto base (si es necesario, a costo de la literalidad, orden original de las palabras, la voz gramatical del texto base, etc.), mientras la formal intenta traducir el texto palabra por palabra (si es necesario, a costo ...
Formal correspondence 'focuses attention on the message itself, in both form and content', unlike dynamic equivalence which is based upon 'the principle of equivalent effect' (1964:159). In the second edition (1982) or their work, the two theorists provide a more detailed explanation of each type of equivalence.
